One Thames or Two
y| John Cotton, former Curator of the Prehistoric Gallery at the Museum of London - October 2016 | Recent Lecture |
|
Jon Cotton pointed out that although London’s river has been a platform for pageantry amongst other things, it has also menaced the city with flooding, as in 2014 at its western edge; throughout prehistory communities would have been attempting to cope with similar events due to global warming causing sea level rise. London is divided by the river: north and south, but also upstream and downstream, the tidal and non-tidal river, with very different characteristics: upriver exemplified by bucolic scenes reminiscent of “Three Men in a Boat”; downriver, Dickensian, a setting for politics, trade, and tragedy such as the 19th century Princess Alice disaster. Jon outlined ways in which the Thames has impacted on those living along its banks: |
By c.3500BC great monuments like the Stanwell Cursus were being laid out; it runs for 4 km and would have required the clearing of woodland, a large number of people to dig plus some kind of Project Manager/Architect. By the Bronze Age there is a recognisable agricultural landscape of fields and farmsteads, and by the Iron Age the development of settlements/villages.
|
4) As a Boundary/Barrier: Where were the important river crossings in former times? The inscribed obelisk in Brentford High Street claims Caesar’s famous crossing for Brentford, as do Westminster, Chelsea, Putney, Kingston, Walton Bridge (the Coway stakes). There are a number of key sites along the river: Putney/Fulham, Woolwich Arsenal, Londinium. Finds at Putney suggest a focus of Bronze Age/Iron Age activity. Later Putney had an important ferry, and perhaps this was a crossing in prehistory. Was Woolwich the London of the Middle Bronze Age? Here there is an enclosure with a huge double ditch, hillfort size, cutting off a promontory. Decades of excavation under Londinium have found no previous settlement - the slopes of Cornhill/Ludgate Hill have Bronze Age materials, but no Iron Age. Caesar makes no mention of settlements along the river, but perhaps they had fallen out of use.
5) As a Sacred Stream: From the Thames have come many objects from different periods: the latter Iron Age Battersea Shield and Waterloo Bridge helmet, a Mesolithic antler mattock from Richmond, a banded stone mace-head from Hammersmith. Why are such objects in the river? Battles? Accidental loss? Or were they being ritually offered to the river, a placating of an elemental force, the cause of flooding? The river may have had two names: upstream, Tamesa, the “flowing one”, downriver something like “Plowonida”, a reconstructed word which may mean the “flooding one”, from which the name “Londinium” may derive. With submerging forests, fields and trackways, sea level rise may have caused prehistoric people, in the absence of engineering solutions such as the Woolwich barrier, to see a need to propitiate the river so that it would not flood. The river’s huge tidal range, now some 7 metres at London Bridge, was once used to drive tidal mills like the one found at Greenwich. And as the tidal head moved up and downriver it could be that there was a concentration of offerings at each new position. European rivers that flow into the North Sea also contain ancient artefacts. And ritual offerings continue: the Asian community offers Divali lamps plus other devotional items such as small statues of Indian gods – the Thames becomes part of the Ganges. And on the Millennium Bridge the phenomenon of love locks – padlocks attached to the sides of the bridge. The keys are thrown into the river – perhaps preparing a conundrum for archaeologists of the future. Yvonne Masson |